← Back to KHAO

Meta ·

Meta did not respond to questions about whether the ads for “secret tax checks” are allowed under its policies

2 min read

Compiled by KHAO Editorial — aggregated from 1 outlet. See llms.txt for citation guidance.

◌ Single Source

Portrait of Mark Zuckerberg in the U.S. Capitol.

CFA is seeking to recover damages and what it says are illegal profits from Meta, in addition to business reforms.

Key facts

Summary

On Tuesday, the nonprofit Consumer Federation of America filed a lawsuit against Meta, alleging that the way the social networking giant handles scammers on its platforms violates Washington, DC’s consumer protection laws. While many online scams involve direct outreach to victims by scammers (who are often themselves human trafficking victims trapped in scam compounds ), CFA’s lawsuit focuses on fraudulent advertising that CFA alleges Meta profited from and allowed to "proliferate on its platforms,” despite publicly promising that it takes cracking down on fraud and scams seriously. In its complaint, CFA points to ads found in Meta’s ads library that CFA claims are types of well-known scams, including several that appear to target people by their birth year and tout $1,400 checks, as well as others that advertise free government iPhones. Meta spokesperson Chris Sgro says, “These allegations misrepresent the reality of their work and they will fight them.

Read full article at Wired →

#meta