← Back to KHAO

Mark Zuckerberg · California · Meta · U.S. Treasury · US Congress ·

Meta is now facing an entirely different question about a different tax break from certain members of Congress

2 min read

Compiled by KHAO Editorial — aggregated from 1 source. See llms.txt for citation guidance.

◌ Single Source

Catherina Gioino.

Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.the reporter.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and Peter Welch (D-Vt.) wrote to Zuckerberg on Oct. 13 requesting an answer by Halloween about Meta’s federal tax filings.

Key facts

Summary

Meta’s filings this week were dominated by its new class of nonvoting stock, which would let Mark Zuckerberg raise cash, including enough to pay for a potential California wealth tax, without giving up control of the company. While that news pertains to an individual’s potential tax bill, Meta’s quarterly report shows how low the company’s tax bill might be. “Our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 was 2%,” Meta said in the report, as compared with 21%, the statutory rate set into federal law. Most of that comes from a single item: On Feb. 18, Treasury issued Notice 2026-7, providing relief from the corporate alternative minimum tax related to previously capitalized U.S. research and development costs. The benefit has a large effect on this year’s rate.

Read full article at Fortune Technology →

#Mark Zuckerberg #California #US Congress #Meta #U.S. Treasury