← Back to KHAO

Circle ·

The group argues MiFID II's Annex I derivative categories already capture perps, so no new law is needed

2 min read

Compiled by KHAO Editorial — aggregated from 2 sources. See llms.txt for citation guidance.

◎ Multiple-sources

HIP-3 volume (red) as compared to Hyperliquid's overall perps volume (blue) via The Block.

HPC also doesn't want perps lumped in with contracts for difference, or CFDs, which ESMA restricted for retail traders in 2018.

Key facts

Summary

The Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) wants the European Commission to treat crypto perpetual futures as derivatives under MiFID II, the EU's existing rulebook for financial instruments first passed in 2014, rather than bring them under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, or MiCA. HPC urged the Commission as such in its response to the Commission's MiCA review, which opened on May 20. "The Consultation arrives at a defining moment for financial markets, as public blockchains now serve as infrastructure for markets that trade continuously and in substantial volume, and regulators in several jurisdictions are working through how regulated products can use them," HPC wrote in its response. USDC issuer Circle used its submission to the same MiCA review to go after the regulation's stablecoin reserve rules. "Of the top 25 stablecoins globally by market capitalisation, only three are currently MiCA-regulated (USDC, USDG, EURC)," Circle wrote describing its submission.

#Circle #European Union