← Back to KHAO

Meta · White House ·

Meta also found support from parent, advocacy and research groups that it supports financially in pushing back against teen bans

2 min read

Compiled by KHAO Editorial — aggregated from 1 source. See llms.txt for citation guidance.

◌ Single Source

Meta headquarters in Menlo Park, California. Photograph:.

Meta’s reliance on influencers to fight the bans suggests the company recognizes it can’t fight these measures, which would could cost it millions of users, alone, said Katie Paul, the director of the Tech Transparency Project.

Key facts

Summary

In July 2025, Meta gathered parenting influencers from all over Australia at a waterfront venue overlooking the Sydney Opera House. Meta was playing defense: the company had five months until the Australian government planned to enforce a new law that banned children under 16 from using social media platforms. A new report by the Tech Transparency Project, a digital advocacy group, shows that whenever a government began discussing social media regulations for teens, Meta started recruiting lifestyle, parenting and mental health creators to promote parental and other safety controls the company already offers, including its accounts for users between the ages of 13 and 17, which have more restrictions than regular accounts. Meta also found support from parent, advocacy and research groups that it supports financially in pushing back against teen bans or restrictions, according to the report.

Read full article at The Guardian Technology →

#Meta #White House