Michael Saylor · Bitcoin · Strategy · Cointelegraph
Saylor turns up heat with ‘110 reasons’ why BIP-110 is a bad idea
Compiled by KHAO Editorial — aggregated from 1 source + 1 reference discovered via search. See llms.txt for citation guidance.
◌ Single Source
The man in control of the biggest Bitcoin corporate treasury said he shares the objectives but disagrees about the remedy detailed in the proposed temporary fork.
Key facts
- ET, on Sunday, the post had been viewed 879,000 times, with 692 replies and 852 retweets
- BIP-110 is one of the more notable protocol-level disputes in the Bitcoin development community since the Blocksize Wars between 2015 and 2017, when ecosystem participants debated whether it
- In the last period, period number 475 between block 955,584 and 957,599, only 1% of blocks were in support
- The dispute comes at a time when Ordinals activity is at near all-time lows, with fewer than 10,000 Ordinals inscribed into the Bitcoin blockchain daily over the last month, down from the more
Summary
Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor took to social media on Sunday to detail his “110 reasons” why a proposed temporary fork to limit non-monetary transactions on the Bitcoin network, or BIP-110, is a bad idea. Bitcoin Improvement Proposal-110 was introduced in December 2025 to stop nonfungible token-like Ordinals inscriptions and other arbitrary data from spamming the network and to preserve BTC’s main use as a peer-to-peer cash system. In a roughly 3,700 word post on X.com, the man in control of the largest Bitcoin (BTC) corporate treasury made a case for what he said are “neutral rules, hard consensus, open markets, and permissionless innovation.