Business · Wired
AI unveils bizarre new kinds of problems, too
Compiled by KHAO Editorial — aggregated from 1 source. See llms.txt for citation guidance.
◌ Single Source
Rumman Chowdhury, the CEO and founder of Humane Intelligence PBC, says FLARE-AI could be a useful way for many AI developers to implement ways of reporting issues with their tools.
Key facts
- The alarm system was developed in collaboration with 49 AI experts from 32 different organizations
- Right now, there is no centralized, accountable way to report flaws in AI systems,” says Avijit Ghosh, an artificial intelligence policy researcher at HuggingFace who co-led development of FLARE-AI
- A group of AI researchers has set up a crowdsourced website, Flaw Reporting for AI (FLARE-AI), for reporting and tracking AI harms
- Rumman Chowdhury, the CEO and founder of Humane Intelligence PBC, says FLARE-AI could be a useful way for many AI developers to implement ways of reporting issues with their tools
Summary
Writing AI Lab each week means the reporter occasionally encounter AI models that behave badly and bizarrely. A group of AI researchers has set up a crowdsourced website, Flaw Reporting for AI (FLARE-AI), for reporting and tracking AI harms. The website is another step in the group’s ongoing work with AI reporting, which the reporter first wrote about last year. “Right now, there is no centralized, accountable way to report flaws in AI systems,” says Avijit Ghosh, an artificial intelligence policy researcher at HuggingFace who co-led development of FLARE-AI with computer scientists Elaine Zhu and Shayne Longpre. The alarm system was developed in collaboration with 49 AI experts from 32 different organizations.